<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati in trouble with the blogosphere?</title>
	<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>Blogging, Geek Tech, Gadgets, Search Engines, Media Player Reviews, Tech News, Web Picks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Pagan Marbury</title>
		<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Pagan Marbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-995</guid>
		<description>I don't understand your objection to my technorati tags. While I mentioned the brewing page scandal in passing, my point was to discuss Weller's alleged "skills". Therefore my tags are appropriate.

I'll admit I've been coasting with the blog these last few months, but perhaps you'd enjoy my archives.  Believe it or not, people dig my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand your objection to my technorati tags. While I mentioned the brewing page scandal in passing, my point was to discuss Weller&#8217;s alleged &#8220;skills&#8221;. Therefore my tags are appropriate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll admit I&#8217;ve been coasting with the blog these last few months, but perhaps you&#8217;d enjoy my archives.  Believe it or not, people dig my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technorati not indexing blogs properly: blogosphere in shock at Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</title>
		<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati not indexing blogs properly: blogosphere in shock at Sparkplug 9 &#62;&#62; bizhack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 07:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] Technorati in trouble with the blogosphere? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Technorati in trouble with the blogosphere? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pi.</title>
		<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Pi.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I'm not surprised by the comment by Amanda on your weblog; I've seen other comments by her in reference to this matter. In one she made a comment about IQ levels which could not be read as anything other than an insult to the weblog owner.

It maybe that the Strumpette weblog is good and interesting, but such reactions tend to drive people away regardless of content. I have made a sensible and calm comment on Strumpette's weblog, but I doubt it will appear since, no matter how you read it, it is critical of Strumpette and Amanda Chapel.

Technorati admitted their mistake, and corrected it. I fail to see the reasoning behind Amanda's continued ire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised by the comment by Amanda on your weblog; I&#8217;ve seen other comments by her in reference to this matter. In one she made a comment about IQ levels which could not be read as anything other than an insult to the weblog owner.</p>
<p>It maybe that the Strumpette weblog is good and interesting, but such reactions tend to drive people away regardless of content. I have made a sensible and calm comment on Strumpette&#8217;s weblog, but I doubt it will appear since, no matter how you read it, it is critical of Strumpette and Amanda Chapel.</p>
<p>Technorati admitted their mistake, and corrected it. I fail to see the reasoning behind Amanda&#8217;s continued ire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erod</title>
		<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Erod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 23:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry you feel that way Amanda. I spend a good amount of money on Adwords so I can assure you I'm not at all a fan of click fraud.

I'm curious... how did you draw that conclusion from this post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry you feel that way Amanda. I spend a good amount of money on Adwords so I can assure you I&#8217;m not at all a fan of click fraud.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious&#8230; how did you draw that conclusion from this post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 18:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>typo sorry... "your" position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typo sorry&#8230; &#8220;your&#8221; position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Chapel</title>
		<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Chapel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Erod,

You're position is ludicrous.  I take it you're a big fan of click fraud, too.

- Amanda Chapel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erod,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re position is ludicrous.  I take it you&#8217;re a big fan of click fraud, too.</p>
<p>- Amanda Chapel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erod</title>
		<link>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Erod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 23:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.erodtech.com/2006/10/21/technorati-in-trouble-with-the-blogosphere/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>WOW! OK I got slapped with several e-mails right after posting this so I suppose I should respond and clear the air. I in no way state that Edelman is right in what it did with the whole Walmart blog fiasco, but at the same time I think a competitor is stepping down a level to try and further beat the dead horse.

-Erod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW! OK I got slapped with several e-mails right after posting this so I suppose I should respond and clear the air. I in no way state that Edelman is right in what it did with the whole Walmart blog fiasco, but at the same time I think a competitor is stepping down a level to try and further beat the dead horse.</p>
<p>-Erod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
